You can no longer expect anything cooler in inexpensive smartphones. Honor 10 Lite Quick Review –

Comparison of Huawei p10 and honor 10 lite: which is better? | nr

Huawei P10

VS

Huawei Honor 10 Lite

We compared 2 smartphones: Huawei P10 released on February 26, 2020 with a 5.1″ screen and HiSilicon Kirin 960 chip, against the 6.21-inch Huawei Honor 10 Lite, which has a HiSilicon Kirin 710 processor and was released 22 months later. Below you you will find characteristics, tests, strengths and weaknesses of each gadget.

Comparison table of technical characteristics of Huawei P10 and Huawei Honor 10 Lite

Play video

To test the “omnivorous” nature of video playback (including support for various codecs, containers and special features, such as subtitles), we used the most common formats, which make up the bulk of the content available on the Internet. Note that for mobile devices it is important to have support for hardware video decoding at the chip level, since it is most often impossible to process modern options using processor cores alone.

Further testing of video playback was performed by Alexey Kudryavtsev.

We did not find the MHL interface, like Mobility DisplayPort, in this smartphone, so we had to limit ourselves to testing the output of video files on the screen of the device itself. To do this, we used a set of test files with an arrow and a rectangle moving one division per frame (see

“Methodology for testing video signal playback and display devices. Version 1 (for mobile devices)»). Screenshots with a shutter speed of 1 s helped determine the nature of the output of frames of video files with various parameters: the resolution varied (1280 by 720 (720p), 1920 by 1080 (1080p)

Note: If green ratings are given in both columns Uniformity and Skips, this means that, most likely, when watching films, artifacts caused by uneven alternation and skipping of frames will either not be visible at all, or their number and visibility will not be will affect viewing comfort. Red marks indicate possible problems with playback of the corresponding files.

According to the criterion of frame output, the quality of playback of video files on the screen of the smartphone itself is good, since in most cases frames (or groups of frames) can (but are not required) be output with more or less uniform alternation of intervals and without skipping frames. When playing video files with a resolution of 1920 by 1080 pixels (1080p) on a smartphone screen, the image of the video file itself is displayed exactly along the border of the screen, one to one in pixels, that is, in the original resolution.

Productivity

The Honor 7X hardware platform is based on the HiSilicon Kirin 659 SoC. The chip configuration includes eight ARM Cortex-A53 processor cores in two clusters with a maximum frequency of 2.36 and 1.7 GHz. The SoC is made using a 16-nanometer process technology. The ARM Mali-T830 (MP2) video accelerator with support for the OpenGL ES 3.2 graphics API is responsible for graphics processing.

It is also possible to expand the memory by installing microSD cards, but applications are not installed on the memory card. You can connect external flash drives in USB OTG mode.

SoC HiSilicon Kirin 659 is a relatively new solution designed for mid-range smartphones and tablets. The SoC is quite productive, at the level of Qualcomm Snapdragon 625; in the AnTuTu test, the hero of the review demonstrates a quite decent 60K-plus points, this is a confident average level.

Kirin 659 provides the system with sufficient performance and in real scenarios allows the smartphone to cope with any modern tasks. There are no problems with games either, all the games we tested, including Injustice 2 and Mortal Kombat X, run without any slowdowns; Lineage 2 can also be played quite comfortably without delays. However, the smartphone is designed more for today; there is no noticeable reserve of power for years to come.

Testing in complex tests AnTuTu and GeekBench:

For convenience, we have summarized all the results we obtained when testing the smartphone in the latest versions of popular benchmarks. The table usually adds several other devices from different segments, also tested on similar latest versions of benchmarks (this is done only for a visual assessment of the obtained dry figures).

Testing the graphics subsystem in 3DMark, GFXBenchmark and Bonsai Benchmark game tests:

When testing in 3DMark, the most powerful smartphones now have the ability to run the application in Unlimited mode, where the rendering resolution is fixed at 720p and VSync is disabled (which can cause the speed to rise above 60 fps).

Browser cross-platform tests:

As for benchmarks for assessing the speed of the javascript engine, you should always make allowances for the fact that their results significantly depend on the browser in which they are launched, so the comparison can only be truly correct on the same OS and browsers, and this option is not always available during testing. For Android OS, we always try to use Google Chrome.

AndroBench memory speed test results:

Screen

The Honor 7C smartphone is equipped with an IPS display covered with 2.5D glass. The screen has physical dimensions of 65×130 mm with a diagonal of 5.7 inches and an aspect ratio of 18:9, the pixel density is about 283 ppi. The screen resolution is 1440×720. The frame on the sides of the screen is almost 4 mm wide, on the top — 10 mm, and on the bottom — 12 mm.

Multi-touch tests diagnose support for 10 simultaneous touches. There is also a light sensor in place to implement automatic brightness adjustment.

A detailed examination using measuring instruments was carried out by the editor of the “Monitors” and “Projectors and TV” sections, Alexey Kudryavtsev. Here is his expert opinion on the screen of the sample under study.

The front surface of the screen is made in the form of a glass plate with a mirror-smooth surface that is scratch-resistant. Judging by the reflection of objects, the anti-glare properties of the screen are slightly worse than those of the Google Nexus 7 (2020) screen (hereinafter simply Nexus 7). For clarity, here is a photo in which the white surface is reflected in the switched off screens (on the left — Nexus 7, on the right — Honor 7C, then they can be distinguished by size):

The screen of the Honor 7C is a little brighter (brightness according to photographs is 127 versus 118 for the Nexus 7). The ghosting of reflected objects in the Honor 7C screen is very weak, this indicates that there is no air gap between the layers of the screen (more specifically, between the outer glass and the surface of the LCD matrix) (OGS — One Glass Solution type screen).

Due to the smaller number of boundaries (glass/air type) with very different refractive indices, such screens look better in conditions of intense external illumination, but their repair in the case of cracked external glass is much more expensive, since the entire screen has to be replaced. There may be a special oleophobic (grease-repellent) coating on the outer surface of the screen, but if there is one, it is much worse in effectiveness than the Nexus 7, so fingerprints are almost as difficult to remove and appear at about the same speed. as in the case of ordinary glass.

With manual brightness control and displaying the white field in full screen, the maximum brightness value was about 430 cd/m², the minimum was 3 cd/m². The maximum brightness is quite high, and, given the good anti-glare properties, something on the screen can be seen even on a sunny day outdoors.

In complete darkness, the brightness can be reduced to a comfortable value. There is automatic brightness adjustment based on the light sensor (it is located to the left of the front camera). In automatic mode, as external lighting conditions change, the screen brightness both increases and decreases. The operation of this function depends on the position of the brightness adjustment; the user can use it to try to set the required brightness level in the current conditions.

We slightly increased the brightness in complete darkness, as a result, for such conditions, the auto-brightness function began to reduce the brightness to 20 cd/m², in an artificially lit office (approximately 550 lux) it was set to 170 cd/m², in a very bright environment (corresponds to lighting on a clear day outdoors, but without direct sunlight — 20,000 lux or a little more)

increased to 430 cd/m². We were quite pleased with the result. It turns out that the auto-brightness function works adequately and allows the user to customize their work to individual requirements. At any brightness level, there is no significant backlight modulation, so there is no screen flicker.

This smartphone uses an IPS type matrix. Microphotographs show typical IPS subpixel structure:

For comparison, you can see the gallery of microphotographs of screens used in mobile technology.

The screen has good viewing angles without significant color shift even with large deviations of the view from perpendicular to the screen and without inverting shades (except for the darkest ones when deviating along one diagonal). For comparison, here are photographs in which identical images are displayed on the screens of Honor 7C and Nexus 7, while the screen brightness is initially set to approximately 200 cd/m², and the color balance on the camera is forcibly switched to 6500 K.

White field perpendicular to the screens:

Note the good uniformity of brightness and color tone of the white field.

And test picture:

The colors on the Honor 7C screen are slightly more saturated. Further tests showed that this is due to slightly increased color contrast. The color balance between the Nexus 7 and our test screen is slightly different.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8e_gWAdzXLg

Now at an angle of approximately 45 degrees to the plane and to the side of the screen:

It can be seen that the colors have not changed much on both screens, but on the Honor 7C the contrast has decreased to a greater extent due to the strong brightening of blacks. He also began to show signs of inverting dark shades.

And the white field:

The brightness at an angle of the screens has decreased (at least 5 times, based on the difference in shutter speed), but in the case of Honor 7C the drop in brightness is greater. When deviated diagonally, the black field brightens greatly, but remains conditionally neutral gray in hue. The photographs below demonstrate this (the brightness of the white areas in the direction perpendicular to the plane of the screens is the same!):

And from another angle:

When viewed perpendicularly, the uniformity of the black field is excellent:

The contrast (approximately in the center of the screen) is high — about 1600:1. Black-white-black response time is 24 ms (14 ms on, 10 ms off). The transition between halftones of gray 25% and 75% (based on the numerical value of the color) and back takes a total of 43 ms. The gamma curve, constructed using 32 points with equal intervals based on the numerical value of the shade of gray, did not reveal any blockage in either the highlights or the shadows.

This device has some kind of dynamic adjustment of the backlight brightness in accordance with the nature of the displayed image. As a result, the resulting dependence of brightness on hue (gamma curve) may not correspond to the gamma curve of a static image, since the measurements were carried out with sequential display of shades of gray on almost the entire screen.

For this reason, we carried out a number of tests — determining contrast and response time, comparing black illumination at angles — (however, as always) when displaying special templates with a constant average brightness, and not monochromatic fields in the entire screen. In general, such non-switchable brightness correction does nothing but harm, since constantly changing the screen brightness can at least cause some discomfort.

Color gamut close to sRGB:

The curvature of the coverage boundary at the transition from yellow to green shows that some kind of software correction is being performed (it’s not clear why). The spectra show that the matrix filters moderately mix the components with each other:

As a result, visually the colors on this screen would not differ from natural ones, but the result is spoiled by a slight overestimation of color contrast. The balance of shades on the gray scale is a compromise, since the color temperature is significantly higher than the standard 6500 K, but the deviation from the blackbody spectrum (ΔE) is below 10, which is considered an acceptable indicator for a consumer device.

At the same time, color temperature and ΔE change little from hue to hue — this has a positive effect on the visual assessment of color balance. (The darkest areas of the gray scale can be ignored, since color balance there is not very important, and the error in measuring color characteristics at low brightness is large.)

This device has the ability to adjust the color balance by adjusting the hue on the color wheel.

In the graphs above, the curves are Without corr. correspond to the results without any color balance correction, and the curves Corr. — data obtained after shifting the point to the position indicated in the image above. It can be seen that the change in balance corresponds to the expected result, since the color temperature approached the standard value, and ΔE increased slightly.

There is some benefit from such a correction, but the maximum brightness has decreased to 380 cd/m², and it is not too much anyway. Note that this function is implemented as a show-case option, since there is no numerical reflection of the correction, there is no field for measuring color balance, and the range is not enough to correct both ΔE and color temperature.

There is a fashionable setting that allows you to reduce the intensity of the blue component.

Marketers tried to intimidate users in order to show the level of care of the manufacturer. Of course, the screen does not have any UV radiation (see spectrum above), and there is no eye fatigue caused specifically by blue light. In principle, bright light can lead to disruption of the circadian rhythm (see the article about the iPad Pro with a 9.7-inch display), but everything can be solved by adjusting the brightness to a comfortable level, and there is absolutely no way to distort the color balance, reducing the contribution of blue sense.

To summarize: the screen has a fairly high maximum brightness and has good anti-glare properties, so the device can be used outdoors without any problems, even on a sunny summer day. In complete darkness, the brightness can be reduced to a comfortable level. It is also possible to use a mode with automatic brightness adjustment, which works adequately.

The advantages of the screen include the absence of an air gap in the layers of the screen and flicker, high contrast, excellent uniformity of the black field, acceptable color balance and a color gamut close to sRGB. The disadvantages are a very weak oleophobic coating (if any), low black stability to deviation of the gaze from perpendicular to the screen plane, as well as non-switchable dynamic adjustment of the backlight brightness and slightly inflated color contrast. In general, the screen is an inexpensive option on an IPS matrix; it causes neither delight nor disgust.

Results

The Honor 10 Lite smartphone, on the one hand, is essentially a cheaper version of the Honor 8X model, on the other hand, it is a more functional option for those for whom the Honor 8C is not enough.

Key points: FullHD resolution, current 8-core chipset, Android version 9, screen diagonal larger than 6 inches, NFC module, 3 GB of RAM, adequate photography (in its price category) with the main and front cameras , FullHD video recording at 60 frames per second.

Honor 10 Lite is a modern, balanced mid-range smartphone at a reasonable price, equipped with all the characteristics and capabilities that are typical for models in this segment.

Advantages

• Large screen diagonal — 6.21 inches.
• FHD matrix with good viewing angles.
• Small frames around the display.
• NFC module.
• Modern appearance: thin body, rounded screen, light weight, interesting decor on the back cover.
• Drop-shaped cutout for selfie camera.
• Current version 9 of Android.
• Night shooting mode.
• At high ISO there is no color noise or major image artifacts.
• FullHD video recording at 60 fps.
• Face recognition in the dark.
• Case included.

Disadvantages

• Combination slot — memory card or second SIM card.
• Applications cannot be installed on the memory card.
• No support for fast charging.

Minor issues

• MicroUSB connector, not USB-C.
• Selfie camera overresolution.
• Back part is easily soiled.

Features

• The event indicator is located on the bottom edge of the case.